Feast II: Sloppy Seconds

This second helping of Feast taste a bit different. This version has been
put in the mixer and what came out is a decent and more gross creature
movie. Most of it works, and is much better that i tought this movie would
be. After a while it almost feels like a ' TREMORS ' movie. Could there
be a Feast 3........i probably would like to see it ...only if there's
more monsters and a decent script.

Anyone who even begins to take this movie seriously has completely missed the point. This movie is great for a night with friends, drinking/smoking what have you. It's pure camp, and makes fun of a lot of films that try to take themselves far to serious. This is a super obscene dramomidy. if you're looking for a scare you're looking in the wrong place. If you're looking for a film that has fun with itself and the genre, with over the top and sometimes extremely "obscene" moments, then this film is defiantly for you. It's defiantly worth it, and I can't wait for Feast 3.

The best part of the original was you never knew who would be eaten next and surprised when the most heroic or sympathetic became lunch meat before some of the more unsavory and secondary characters.

The sequel antes up the blood and gore but in a different location with a couple of eye-popping deaths involving a dying grandmother and a baby. The trapped victims on a roof decide the building across the way is safer for them and because the creatures are roaming the streets they build a catapult to fling themselves from one roof to the other(ludicrous) They arn't sure if the catapult will work so they decide to use the old grandmother as a test. Her grandsons, midget wrestlers,(I don't make this stuff up folks) are against this at first but they relent and grandma is loaded onto the catapult-they let fly and grandma squishes into the side of the building across the street. I will not go into details about what happens to the infant. Let's just say there was no holding back on what happens(dis-tasteful but brave).

I rated two stars because the movie succeeds in being gross as it intended but it's not much of a movie unless you like, chomp, chew and swallow.

I just read the first three angry/disappointed/offended reviews for this movie and feel compelled to throw my own opinion into this discussion.

This movie, like its prequel, is fun as hell to watch. John Gulager clearly loves cheesy personalities and unnecessarily grossing out his audience--it seems like that's the primary reason why he made Feast and Feast II. Both movies are more satirical of the monster movie subgenre than they are commemorative--I would compare them with Scream and Tremors.

The whole scene inside Thunder and Lightening's "fort" was absolutely hilarious, because it's obvious that the movie is incredibly aware of itself during that scene. Slasher's probably the funniest character, but Gulager's writers did an excellent job making Honey Pie the dumbest bitch you ever saw and making that other car salesman (forgot his name) an outrageous sap (I loved that the movie kept putting him in situations in which he could redeem himself and then making him fail miserably).

It's a great movie to watch (especially with a group of friends), and it's pretty unpredictable in a few instances (I noticed the girl who wrote a review a few spaces before me mentioned the baby scene--that was awesome). I would highly recommend this movie to anybody who appreciates a monster movie that can make them laugh.

The first film worked so well hidden in the darkness of night. With Feast 2, the harsh sunlight exposes the cheese, and the cheese has melted into an oily blob in the gutter. Very sloppy indeed.