Feast II: Sloppy Seconds

part one was an unexpected gem of a indie horror movie. fast paced, hot women and decent fx. to add, it didnt take itself too seriously. here it was an utter mess. it tried to do too much or wanted to be ''evil dead 3'' too badly.

this picks up minutes after part 1 ended. i like when sequels do that. the sister of the chick who was going to rob the bar is searching for her. sister (whos the boss of an all girl biker gang) stubbles across the old bartender and the stupidty begins.

this is a much better comedy than horror movie but its even short on laughs. a better title would have been ''least''.

Take everything you love about the first feast movie and throw it out, all resemblances of horror movie are taken away. It does everything wrong and dumbs the movie down more than was needed. I didn't expect a classic like the first, but there was maybe one notable kill, one or two funny lines, and 80 minutes of movie I didn't want to watch. You know a horror movie can't be good when the "best" characters are a pair a wrestling midgets. This isn't supposed to be a comedy, I loved the first and was greatly disappointed by this sequel.

I really enjoyed the first Feast, and I really enjoyed this one, but they are very different movies. While Feast tried to be somewhat serious, Feast II is an over the top splatter and puke gorefest. The casual horror movie fan is going to be turned off at the ridiculous amounts of puking, disembowelments, and other tasteless humor. I loved it.

When a movie starts out with dwarf Mexican luchadores, full frontal female nudity, a prosthetic penis that Dirk Diggler would envy, and buckets of gore, you know you're in for a good ride.

There is a puke scene that rivals the one in "Stand By Me", and the fart/feces humor is on par with American Pie. The "rotting grandma" is a memorable theme, and there is even a toddler death that is pretty disgusting.

But the one thing that really stands out is the most gratuitous nude scene I've seen in a LOOOONG time. In order to build a catipult, two biker chicks have to give up all their clothes except for their thongs and leather gun holsters. I guess they didn't realize the male characters all had on several layers of clothes, but hey - I'M NOT COMPLAINING!! They just stood around topless for a good 10 - 15 minutes. LOL!

The only real negative to this movie is the poor CGI and "green screen" effects. I realize this was shot on a low budget, but jeeze, there were some pitiful effects at times.

Still, I have to recommend this to gorehounds. Stay away if you squirm at movies like Scream or I Know What You Did Last Summer. This is getting near old Peter Jackson territory!!

The first FEAST was a hip, edgy, funny, over the top film that had horror fans like myself wanting more.

The filmmakers want to have more blood, guts, nudity, and violence, and generally break some taboos for this sequel. And boy they did they ever. So much so that I hit the stop button after one particular scene.

If you have children or are sqeamish, you may want to pass this movie up. In one of the most tasteless, disturbing and shocking sequences I've ever seen in a film, a cute baby is hurled into the air. We then see him falling in slow-motion before he hits the ground. We then see the poor child crying and writhing in a pool of his own blood before being eaten by the monsters.

I understand the point of the Feast movies, to be funny and gory and they are, but why kill a baby? I personally felt this was very uneccesary and will be passing up on that 3rd Feast. I don't have much of an appetite anymore.

dont bother seein this if you were a fan of the first one then dont look into this one because you will be pissed off the movie was made simply just to be made and to get you you to buy it no effort was made to make it interesting